Legal Opinion

Great Lakes-Dunbar-Rochester v. State Tax Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

There is substantial evidence in the record of the proceedings before the State Tax Commission to support the Commission’s determination that designated “rental” and “lease” payments made by petitioner Great Lakes-Dunbar-Rochester, a joint venture, to the corporate venturers were, in fact, for rentals of vessels and equipment and, thus, subject to the use tax imposed by Tax Law § 1110. Therefore we reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the Commission’s determination.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. formed a joint venture…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy, Inc. v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. MATTER OF MEM'L HOSP. v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Matter of HDV Manhattan, LLC v. Tax Appeals Trib. of The State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Whitehill v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Manhattan & Queens Fuel Corp. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API