Legal Opinion

Peters v. Streep

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Queens, Third District. Action by Harry W. Peters against J. Newton Streep. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed on condition that plaintiff enter remittitur; otherwise, reversed.

1Per curiam

The judgment appealed from erroneously includes an award of $150 for the loss of the use of the automobile during the period of 15 days that it was claimed the machine was undergoing repair. No proof was offered that it necessarily took 15 days, or any particular length of time, to repair the machine; nor was there any evidence whatever as to the reasonable value of the use of such a car, unless the testimony of a witness that it was worth $20 a day to hire such a car be regarded as evidence of such usable value.

Conceding that the plaintiff, if deprived of the usable value of his automobile…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MinerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  2. Bondy v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  3. Murphy v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vetter v. BrowneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API