Legal Opinion

Sexton v. City of Jonesboro

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1997No. S96A1391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hines, Justice.

The issue is whether the City of Jonesboro’s occupational tax ordinance 1 operates as an unconstitutional precondition on the practice of law, and therefore, impermissibly regulates the practice of law. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that it does.

The City of Jonesboro enacted an ordinance to provide for a new system of occupational tax regulations. 2 The ordinance, as amended, establishes that for the year 1995 and succeeding years thereafter, an occupational tax be levied on persons engaged in any business, trade, profession, or occupation in the city. 3 It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmond County Business Ass'n v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Chanin v. Bibb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Brown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Silverman v. Mayor &C. of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Gleason v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MagrasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. City of Atlanta v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Barnes v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. Wallace v. State BarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Smith v. MagrasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API