Legal Opinion
Owens v. Feigin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 3, 2008No. A-43 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole question in this appeal is whether the notice-of-claim requirement in the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (TCA), N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to 12-3, applies to a cause of action under New Jersey’s Civil Rights Act (CRA), N.J.S.A. 10:6-1 to -2. The trial court originally dismissed plaintiffs’ CRA claim for failure to satisfy the TCA’s notice-of-claim requirement, but that decision was reversed on appeal. Owens v. Feigin, 394 N.J.Super. 85, 97, 925 A.2d 106 (2007). We granted certification to review the Appellate Division’s determination. 192 N.J. 473, 932 A.2d 25 (2007). We find nothing in the CRA’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Brennan v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Velez v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Luis Perez v. Zagami, LLC (071358)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Ramos v. FlowersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Felicioni v. Admin. Office of CourtsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Hottenstein v. City of Sea Isle CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.