Tarman v. Rowe
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
Is a tenant who does not purchase under a “non-eviction” co-operative conversion plan protected in his right of continued occupancy under the New York City Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of New York, § YY51-1.0 et seq.) as against the purchaser of his unit? “No” is the startling answer asserted by such a purchaser who claims a right to evict under section 54 of the Code of the Real Estate Industry Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc. (the Code), adopted pursuant to such law. As will be seen below, such answer is based on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Richards v. KaskelNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ortega v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- MATTER OF TOMBINI v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Oste v. New York City Rent & Rehabilitation AdministrationNew York Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langdale Owners Corp. v. LaneAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
- Colby v. MoyerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1982