State v. Jose
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAYORATO, Chief Justice.
James Jose appeals from his judgment of sentence and court-ordered restitution imposed following his plea of guilty to forgery. He contends that the district court abused its discretion by considering unproven charges in sentencing him. He also challenges the restitution imposed. Finding no abuse of discretion regarding sentencing, we affirm on that issue. We remand with directions on the restitution issue.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
On January 12, 2000, the State charged Jose with one count of forgery and one count of malicious prosecution. See Iowa Code §§…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. SailerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- State v. MesserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. SwartzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Charles Raymond AlbrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. ValinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Kenneth Ray Washington IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Iowa v. Zedekiah Douglas KurtzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.