Legal Opinion

Martel v. Chattanooga Parking Stations, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Dyer

The appellant, Elizabeth Diane Martel, appeals from the action of the trial judge in dismissing, upon demurrer, her declaration for damages resulting from a vehicle collision.

The facts necessary to note are as follows: Appellee, Chattanooga Parking Stations, Inc., operates several public parking lots in Chattanooga, Tennessee. On October 18, 1968, one, Adrilene D. Bowen, drove her Pontiac automobile to one of the appellee’s parking lots for the purpose of having her car parked thereon. Appellee’s procedure in parking cars was for an attendant to give the owner or driver a claim check and then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Justus v. WoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Teague v. PritchardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  3. Young v. Costner-Eagleton Motors, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Parker v. Charlie Kittle Pontiac Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kim v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rowe v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API