Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Home Indemnity Company v. Mosqueda

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1971No. 580Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSharpe, Justice

I concur in affirmance of the judgment awarding Camilio Mosqueda, appellee, the amounts of $12,600.00 as payment under the Workmen’s Compensation Statutes on account of the death of his father, $1,512.-00 as a 12% penalty on the amount of $12,600.00, and $6,410.00 as attorney’s fees. However, I respectfully dissent with reference to the judgment of this Court which awards interest at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum on the amounts stated.

Appellee’s primary contention under his cross-point is that six (6%) per cent per annum is the correct rate of interest to be applied to the award of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Consolidated Casualty Insurance Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. General Ins. Corp. v. HandyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Mosqueda v. Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API