Legal Opinion

State v. Richter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1992No. S-90-568PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Gerald Richter appeals his conviction for third-offense drunk driving and refusal to provide a breath sample. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in affirming the ruling of the county court, which refused to dismiss the case based upon the speedy trial provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207 (Reissue 1989).

The standard of review of factual determinations by the trial court in support of its decision on a speedy trial question is not explicitly addressed in any Nebraska case. However, generally, an appellate court is to “accord weight” to findings of fact by the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. OldfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. State v. SumstineNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Interest of AWNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CoomesNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. BlocherNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. ChapmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API