Legal Opinion

Electro-Motive Division v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1952No. 32105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

On the petition of Milow Priest, whom we will refer to as plaintiff, a writ of error was issued under section 19(f)(2) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap. 48, par. 156(f)(2),) to review the decision of the superior court of Cook County setting aside an award of the Industrial Commission in favor of Milow Priest for the loss of an eye allegedly due to an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant, Electro-Motive Division, General Motors Corporation.

The sole inquiry in this cause is whether the superior court erred in setting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Boutwell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. W. M. Allen Son. & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hendren v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pillsbury Mills, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API