Legal Opinion

In re Smith

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided April 14, 1893No. 4,488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Law. Appeal by the surveyor of customs from décision of the board of general appraisers.

1Opinion of the Court

SAGE, District Judge.

Tills case is before the court upon the application of the surveyor and acting collector of customs, Cincinnati, Ohio, for a review of the decision of the hoard of general appraisers, rendered the ::TM of October, 1891, in the matter of the protest of Mihalovitch, Fletcher & Co. against the decision of the surveyor of customs at Cincinnati, Ohio, as to the rate and amount of duties chargeable on certain fancy flint glass bottles imported per Lady Palmer, July 7,1891.

The merchandise in question was classified as “flint-glass ware,” under paragraph 106, Act October 1, 1890,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. GoodrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Recknagel v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. MihalovitchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API