Pruitt v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGersten, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I would deny cer-tiorari because the trial court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing the defendant to ninety days incarceration. Absent a departure from the essential requirements of law, there are no grounds, other than second guessing a trial court, to grant certiorari.
Certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and a petition should only be granted where there is a clear violation of an established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice. Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983). See Conahan v. Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Combs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Conahan v. DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. ShawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- American Southern Co. v. Tinter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Fla. Sheriffs'self-Ins. Fund v. Escambia Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.