Walker v. McCusker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County, refusing to dissolve an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action was brought to recover of the defendant, as tenant in possession of real estate purchased by plaintiff on decree of foreclosure and sale, the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars, value of the use and occupation from the day of sale to the making of the deed. The plaintiff sued out a writ of attachment by which property was attached; the defendant moved that the attachment be dissolved; the court below denied the motion, and the appeal from the order of denial is before us.
Section 707 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that the purchaser, from the time of sale,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Mudge v. SteinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Talcott Land Co. v. HershiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Cate v. StapletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.