Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Matz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARTER, J.

The parties will be designated as they were in the Court of Common Pleas.

The action below was upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant to the First National Bank of Woods-field, Ohio, upon which note judgment was taken by confession on a warrant of attorney contained in the note.

A motion was made by the defendant moving the court to open up and vacate the judgment for the claimed reason that the defendant had a good and valid defense to the note. This motion was by the court sustained, the judgment vacated and the defendant was permitted to file an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Barker v. HaubergIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Townsend v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API