Legal Opinion
Burke v. Brown
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchreiber, J.
The codefendants herein are adjoining property owners and are sued together and in the alternative by plaintiff who claims injuries from a fall on a cement block on the line between the two houses. Defendant Brown cross claimed against defendant Gilbert alleging that the latter erected the block. Brown moved to vacate a demand for a bill of particulars solely on the law, making no claim that he was *904unable to furnish particulars on this point. It may well be said that he otherwise clearly indicated that he did have such information. Upon denial of the motion and refusal of the court to sign an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Losie v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- John Reis Co. v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Chartered Bank of India, Australia & China v. Nassau Fire Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Royce v. ZiegfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- de Cordova v. SanvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burke v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- In re the Estate of LombardiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- Jeshion v. HolzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961