DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
Edward DeSantis and Risk Deterrence, Inc. (appellants) appeal from a judgment granting a permanent injunction and attorney’s fees to The Wackenhut Corporation (appellee) in a case involving the alleged breach of a non-compete agreement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellants raise nineteen points of error on appeal. They argue that Wackenhut is not entitled to the injunction because it failed to prove irreparable injury and because the trial court erred in concluding that irreparable injury was presumed due to Florida “procedural” law. They allege that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Hill v. Mobile Auto Trim, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Hartwell's Office World, Inc. v. Systex Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Pennwell Corp. v. Ken Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Bland v. Henry & Peters, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1988
- Frisco Medical Center, L.L.P. v. BledsoeDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
- Motorola, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.