Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local Union 985
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
I dissent because I disagree with the majority that the term “actually working” is unambiguous. When the arbitrator must interpret a contract ambiguity, our case law is now quite clear (despite my dissent) that our review is restrained by “one of the narrowest standards of judicial review in all of American jurisprudence.” Lattimer-Stevens Co. v. United Steelworkers of Am., AFL-CIO, Dist. 27, Sub-Dist. 5, 913 F.2d 1166, 1169 (6th Cir.1990); and see id. at 1170-71 (Boggs, J., dissenting). The parties contracted for the arbitrator’s construction of the contract, not the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The Lattimer-Stevens Company v. The United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, District 27, Sub-District 5Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- The Beacon Journal Publishing Company v. The Akron Newspaper Guild, Local Number 7Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Cement Divisions, National Gypsum Co. v. United Steelworkers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.