Legal Opinion

Blake v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The following excerpt from the charge constitutes the only exception brought forward and discussed in plaintiff’s brief: “Our court has held in Groome v. Statesville (207 N.C. 538), that if there are two ways'open to a person to use — one safe and the other dangerous — the choice of the dangerous way with knowledge of the danger constitutes contributory negligence, and where a person sui juris, that is, aboye the age of minority, and so on, knows of a dangerous condition and voluntarily goes into the place of danger, he is guilty of contributory negligence which will bar his recovery.”

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Russell v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Price v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. McClellan v. City of ConcordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API