State v. Moore

HORTON, Justice.

Steven Michael Moore appeals the district court's decision denying his motion to suppress his identification by an eyewitness. The district court found that law enforcement had engaged in a suggestive identification procedure but concluded that the identification was nonetheless reliable under the five-factor reliability test first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Neil v. Biggers , 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). Moore argues that the district court should have suppressed the identification because the district court's findings regarding…