Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ellsworth

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Eespondents Ellsworth and Dixon were convicted of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm, less than the crime of murder, and the respondent Oraig, of assault and battery, upon a joint trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

The respondents Ellsworth and Dixon *444were found guilty of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm, less than the crime of murder, and the respondent Craig guilty of an assault and battery, on a joint trial upon the following information, duly verified:

“ State or Michigan,
“ The Circuit Court for the county of Newaygo.
“Newaygo County — ss.
“A. F. Tibbitts, prosecuting attorney in and for the county of Newaygo, aforesaid, for and in behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, comes into said court in the October term thereof, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-one, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Woodford v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. State v. McAvoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Turner v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. GleasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hughes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. DurhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. KynerdMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State ex rel. Klitzke v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 88Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API