United States v. Edminston
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District judge.
Defendant was charged with violation of probation and has, through counsel, filed what is termed a plea of prescription — that is, his term of probation had expired when he was brought before the court the first time to have it revoked.
The minutes of this court show that Edminston was charged in an indictment of three counts with the violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 408, including conspiracy; and that on February 21, 1933, he was arraigned and plead guilty to all counts, but was released on bond to await disposition at a later date to permit investigation by…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961
- Ockel v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- United States v. PisanoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. SquillanteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.