Legal Opinion

Frankland v. Remington Phonograph Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 22, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The plea must be overruled.

*314■■ 1. The appointment by a court of another state of a receiver of the assets of a Delaware corporation located in such other state cannot serve to deprive this court of its jurisdiction to appoint á general receiver for the same corporation. This is true, even though the foreign court should assume not to confine the powers of its receiver simply to corporate assets found within its jurisdiction, but to extend his powers to embrace those of a general receiver for the corporation. It would be contrary to well-established and universally accepted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  2. Maguire v. Mortgage Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. Hutchinson v. American Palace-Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1900
  4. Popper v. Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen FriendsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Stockley v. Jacob Thomas & SonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stone v. Jewett, Bigelow & Brooks Coal Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  2. FTE Networks, Inc. v. SzkaradekDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API