Legal Opinion

Decker v. Decker

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided October 11, 1906No. 412APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNNISON, District Judge.

This matter arises on demurrers to the complaint by two of the defendants, J. M. Decker and B. M. Behrends. Plaintiff sues, not as an individual, but as the heir of E. O. Decker, deceased. The action is *122against J. M. Decker as the administrator of the partnership estate of Decker Bros., in which her deceased husband, E. O. Decker, was a partner, and against the sureties on J. M. Decker’s bond as such administrator. Three separate causes of action are set up in the complaint, each of which is based upon an alleged wrongful and fraudulent act of the defendant Decker.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Adams v. PetrainOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Gatch v. SimpsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Steel v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hamlin v. KinneyOregon Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
  2. In re Johnson's EstateDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API