Legal Opinion
FORSTNER
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1983No. ID 2936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2936 MATTER OF FORSTNEEt In Deportation Proceedings • A-30461480 Decided by Board February 24, 1988 Expungement of a narcotics conviction pursuant to section 137.225 of the Oregon Revised Statutes does not eliminate the conviction for purposes of deportation because that statute is not a state counterpart to the federal first offender statute, 21 U.S.C. 844(b)(1). CHARGE: Order. Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(11) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(11))—Convicted of a narcotics violation ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: Gerald II. Rubinson, •squiie Kendall D. Warren 1001 S. W. Fifth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Maria Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- A-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
- WERKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
- Maximilliano De La Cruz-Martinez, Also Known as Max Cruz, Max De La Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- James Edward Kelly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- MANRIQUEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- CARRILLOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984