Legal Opinion

Ward v. Taylor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

This was an action of - assumpsit, brought by Taylor against Ward, to recover the price of a threshing machine.

The declaration wa¡s for goods sold and delivered.

The question which we shall consider is, whether, upon the facts in this case, an action lies for goods sold and delivered.

In order to maintain the count for goods sold and delivered, it is essential that the goods should have been delivered to the defendant or his agent, or to a third person at his request, or that something equivalent to a delivery should have occurred.

It is claimed that the delivery of the machine to the railroad…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Stafford & Brother v. Walter & SkeltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Vaughn v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905
  4. Kitchin v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  5. Des Moines N. & W. Ry. Co. v. Block-Pollak Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API