Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Morton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 23, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Gallatin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coust by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

This is a controversy over the will of Hugh Montgomery, between the children and descendants of those *794who are dead, of his first wife andhi's second wife and her ', child hy him. The parties first named are cofitesting then will.

'Théy alleged that at the time it was executed Hugh" Montgomery did not have such mental.capacity as:to enable him to know the natural objects of his bounty, his ' obligation to them, the character and value, of his property, nór how to dispose of it according to a fixed purpose of his'own; that one of the contestees, his…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blanton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Jones v. BeckleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of WineteerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Schwartz Showell Corp. v. BonfiglioMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API