Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburg v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Crawford District Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action in the nature of a criminal prosecution, wherein the city of Pittsburg, a city of the second class, was the plaintiff, and Mrs. A. E. Reynolds was the defendant, and in which the defendant was charged with violating a city ordinance prohibiting the keeping or maintenance of places where intoxicating liquors were sold or kept for sale. The action was commenced before the police judge of the city, but after trial and judgment the case was appealed by the defendant to the district court, in which court *361the defendant filed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Walker-Taylor Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. City of Kansas v. OvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Kansas Breeze Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API