Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Defendant in error sued the plaintiff in error in the Circuit Court in and for Dade County. The declaration was in two counts. The first count declared as endorsee of three certain promissory notes in the sum of $5,000.00 each, not then matured, and relied upon the acceleration clause contained in a mortgage made by the makers of the notes to secure the payment of these notes and another in like amount then past due and unpaid to accelerate the maturity of the said three notes and because of which plaintiff alleged the exercise of the right created by such acceleration to prosecute the suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. American National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Baumeister v. KuntzSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Sparado v. BairdSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Fannin v. FritterSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grier v. MHC REALTY CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. Tharp v. Kitchell Tharp v. HiscockSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Casino Espanol de la Habana, Inc. v. BusselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API