Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1970No. 70-291 CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

ORDER

Defendant has moved for summary judgment, and its Motion is confined to the issue of punitive damages. Plaintiff has responded with a Motion in Denial of Summary Judgment, which the Court will consider as a Response, rather than a Motion. Defendant contends that no genuine material issue of fact exists in the case with respect to Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages and that Plaintiff is not entitled to such damages as a matter of law.

According to the undisputed facts, Plaintiff was insured by Defendant against losses arising out of fire or due to theft of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Moral Insurance Company v. CookseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Century Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Renfroe v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Shields v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API