Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall v. Ove Skou Rederia A/S

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1967No. 23295Published

1DissentGewin, Circuit Judge

Admittedly this is an appealing case in which to find some theory by which the libelant can recover for injuries sustained during what, in the normal course of events, should have been a routine and incident free loading operation. That the injuries resulted from the failure of a cargo sling to hold its cargo makes the libelant’s case all the more attractive. Nevertheless, on the basis of the district court’s findings and the record before us, I am unable to join in the conclusion of the majority that as a matter of law the use of chain slings rendered the ship unseaworthy. In reaching that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Morales v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Robert Blassingill v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API