Smith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Shawn Michael Smith seeks review of his judgment and sentence for possession of a controlled substance and possession of paraphernalia. Smith argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish his constructive possession of the controlled substance and paraphernalia. Smith also raises a challenge to the constitutionality of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2010). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The evidence presented at trial established that an officer conducted a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Mackle Vincent Shelton v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Martoral v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Meme v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Hargrove v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- DEMETRIUS NUGENT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- N.G.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- N. G. S. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- N.G.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019