Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Lund

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1931No. 554PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARDEE, PJ.

So, the trial court had complete jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the litigation and of all the parties interested therein.

In the Court of Common Pleas, the prayer of the Sharp heirs was granted and $10,000 was ordefed paid to them out of the proceeds resulting from the sale of said real estate; and the Burrell heirs being dissatisfied with said judgment, have appealed to this court.

In the brief filed by the attorneys for the Burrell heirs the questions presented are tersely stated as follows;

“The only question before the court, raised by the cross-petitions, is whether or not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bidwell v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McClung v. SiegWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Von Lingen v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API