Legal Opinion

Weismann v. Goss

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1982No. 81-4217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

The Hawaii Corporation (THC) is a corporate bankrupt undergoing reorganization pursuant to Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898. Appellants are a group of investors who appeal from an order of the district court, sitting in bankruptcy, subordinating certain of the investors’ claims against THC. Because we find that subordination was appropriate in this case, we affirm.

I

FACTS

Appellants’ claims against THC’s bankruptcy estate arise through a series of transactions involving four separate entities. Prior to 1969, appellants held capital stock and 614% Collateralized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WangemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. Beverly McConnell v. Estate of W. H. Butler, Oscar Strobel, Trustee of the Estate of E. W. Reynolds Company v. Estate of W. H. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. In Re Peoples Loan & Investment CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1970
  4. National Telephone Co. v. O'BrienDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
  5. National Telephone Co., Inc., Matter OfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawaii Corporation v. GossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API