Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Ogrodowicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: The court charged in part: “ If the opinion of the man claiming superior information in matters of handwriting is accepted, it follows that the two witnesses named in the will testified falsely upon matters as to which they inescapably knew the truth. That is the issue presented to you.” We believe that the charge on that subject was erroneous and so prejudicial as to require a reversal and a new trial. (See Smith v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 170 N. Y. 394; Segaloff v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Beers v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API