Legal Opinion

Farragut Gardens No. 1, Inc. v. Boyland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Such an assessment is not illegal, but erroneous, and a review thereof requires compliance with the provisions of the New York City Charter, the Administrative Code and the Tax Law, which provide an adequate and exclusive remedy. (People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc., v. Purdy, 179 App. Div. 748, affd. 222 N. Y. 657; Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 262 N. Y. 312; People ex rel. Harway Improvement Co. v. Berry, 139 Misc. 614, affd. 233 App. Div. 851, 865, affd. 258 N. Y. 590.) The procedure adopted by appellant has no basis in law. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sikora Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc. v. PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. People Ex Rel. Soeurbee, Incorporated v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. People Ex Rel. Harway Improvement Company v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. People ex rel. Harway Improvement Co. v. BerryNew York Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alwalt Realty Corp. v. BoylandNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Insurance Fund v. BoylandNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API