Legal Opinion

Burstyn v. City of Miami Beach

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 12, 1987No. 84-515-CivPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.

At issue in this non-jury trial are five provisions of the Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance that regulate adult congregate living facilities (ACLFs). The plaintiffs allege that the provisions are arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and that they violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages. The court bifurcated the damages issues and initially considered only the validity of the ordinance.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Horizon House Developmental Services, Inc. v. Township of Upper SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-HillsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  3. Moss v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  4. KHODARA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. EX REL. EAGLE v. BeckmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Toback v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API