Legal Opinion
Johannsen v. Union Iron Works
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 23, 1922PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Minttjrn, Kaltsch, White, Heppenukimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by19 opinions
- Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Dawson's Charter Service v. ChinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Globe Cotton Oil Mills v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Graf v. National Steel Products Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.