Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ellison

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 10, 1982No. 40,461; ACM 22720Published

1ConcurrenceEverett, Chief Judge

I agree fully with the majority opinion. Although a court-martial lacks the permanence of a Federal District Court, it does have some continuity and does not change with every variation in the membership of the court. Thus, if a convening authority refers a case for trial by a court-martial which he has appointed, he does not have to refer the case again when a member is excused or replaced; despite the change in members, the court-martial remains the same. Moreover, the language of Article 29, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 829, which deals with “Absent and additional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. William H. Miller, United States of America v. Maurice GregoryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Stanley Bernard Peterson, United States of America v. Eric Sylvester Smith, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Linda Lavern Smith, United States of America v. Paul James Coates, Jr., United States of America v. D'TiTinius W. Frazier, United States of America v. Lester IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API