Legal Opinion
In re Boardwalk Amusement Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
There is little or no dispute as to the facts involved in this appeal. The city of New York began a condemnation proceeding- for opening and extending the Bowery from West Sixteenth street in the borough of Brooklyn. The proceeding was instituted in October, 1927. The city of New York contended that the Bowery had been dedicated as a street and that, consequently, the damages awarded should be nominal. The condemnation proceeding came on for trial, and, in June, 1932, the court held that there had been no dedication of the Bowery as a public street. The city of New York was, therefore, faced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolan v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Andrewes v. . HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Matter of Dept. of Public W'ks of N.Y. CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Vastola v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942