Legal Opinion
Amodeo v. Cumella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In. an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O’Rourke, J.), entered February 22, 2006, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants Angelo Cumella and Comprehensive Women’s Health, EC., and against *397her dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendants Angelo Cumella and Comprehensive Women’s Health, EC., and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rivera v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Caristo v. SanzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hardy v. SicuranzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Muye v. LibenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shalot v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Crayton v. SherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018