Legal Opinion

Mallard v. Forest Heights Water Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2003No. A03A0804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

■Following a grant of summary judgment to the defendants Forest Heights Water Works, Inc. and Lee Anderson (“Forest Heights”), Robert and Donna Mallard appeal, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) finding that ten percent per month late fees charged by Forest Heights for unpaid water bills were not within the scope of usury laws, and (2) failing to rule on the Mallards’ motion to compel discovery before granting summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, with the evidence viewed in the nonmovant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Hall v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Knight v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Hooks v. Cobb Center Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fedina v. LarichevCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Bo Phillips Company, Inc. v. R.L. King Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Golden Atlanta Site Development, Inc. v. NahaiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Matson v. Noble Investment Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Bo Phillips Company, Inc. v. R.L. King Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API