State v. James
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Daniel G. James appeals from his conviction for attempted first degree sexual assault on a child.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
A trial court’s findings in a criminal case have the effect of a jury verdict, and a conviction in a bench trial will be sustained if the properly admitted trial evidence, viewed and construed most favorably to the State, is sufficient to support the conviction. State v. Abbink, 260 Neb. 211, 616 N.W.2d 8 (2000).
FACTS
James was charged by information with first degree sexual assault on a child, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-319(l)(c) (Reissue 1995). The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. LeFurgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Commonwealth v. GosselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- State v. PribilNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. KeupNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. GreshamNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Jordan B. (In Re Interest of Jordan B.)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.