Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1954No. 26,882Published

1DissentMorrison, Judge

In order to accept prosecutrix’ testimony completely and reject without consideration the testimony of appellant and his witnesses, one must ignore what to me is a compelling circumstance.

Prosecutrix’ father was a tenant farmer working on the halves for the appellant. A short while before the alleged assault appellant and prosecutrix’ mother had had a misunderstanding over financial matters. Prosecutrix claims the indecent proposal was made on Thursday afternoon. And yet she made no report of it until Sunday. There was a telephone next door; she did not use it. Her husband came home Thursday…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Pittcock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  4. Ex Parte LittlefieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API