Legal Opinion

State v. McGraw & Killeen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 2018No. 44935 & 44942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLorello, Judge

The State appeals from the district court's orders granting Brian McGraw's and Lacey Killeen's motions to suppress evidence resulting from a search subsequent to a drug-dog sniff conducted during a traffic stop. The State argues that the officers did not abandon the initial purpose of the traffic stop, and therefore the district court erred in granting the suppression motions. For the reasons explained below, we reverse and remand.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

While on patrol, a police officer (Officer One) conducted a traffic stop on a car driven by Killeen in which McGraw was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. RileyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. AshbeyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. DewittIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. Hale, IIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API