Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 21, 2015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lisa’s opinion reported at 429 N.J.Super. 533, 60 A.3d 806 (App.Div.2013).

For affirmance — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON and SOLOMON — 5.

Opposed — None.

Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BishopNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. Donnell W. AncrumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  2. AZIZ M. THABO VS. Z TRANSPORTATION(L-3296-15, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  3. DARRELL B. BROWN VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (L-1538-16, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  4. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TEVIN M. FIGARO STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTHONY J. GREEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ABE HAROLD (17-05-0465, 17-10-0945, 17-10-0961, 19-03-0275, 19-04-0318, AND 16-09-0824, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  5. State v. DolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015