Legal Opinion
State v. Bishop
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 21, 2015PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lisa’s opinion reported at 429 N.J.Super. 533, 60 A.3d 806 (App.Div.2013).
For affirmance — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON and SOLOMON — 5.
Opposed — None.
Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 2.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BishopNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of New Jersey v. Donnell W. AncrumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- AZIZ M. THABO VS. Z TRANSPORTATION(L-3296-15, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- DARRELL B. BROWN VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (L-1538-16, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TEVIN M. FIGARO STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTHONY J. GREEN STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ABE HAROLD (17-05-0465, 17-10-0945, 17-10-0961, 19-03-0275, 19-04-0318, AND 16-09-0824, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- State v. DolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015