Legal Opinion
Jones v. Noble Drilling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1943No. 2650PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
On and prior to January 22, 1937, Noble Drilling Company, hereinafter called the parent, and Noble Drilling Company of Oklahoma, hereinafter called the subsidiary, were corporations organized and existing under the laws of Delaware. The parent owned all the capital stock of the subsidiary. Noble Drilling Company, Inc.., was organized under the laws of Delaware on January 22, 1937. Prior to January 27, 1937, it had no assets, except the proceeds of 100 shares of its capital stock issued for $10 per share. All of its capital stock was owned by the parent. It was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Helvering v. Independent Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Railroad Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Helvering v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Western Maryland Ry. Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Paving Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Standard Paving Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Stanton Brewery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- E. & J. Gallo Winery, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- First Nat. Bank in Houston v. Scofield, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- First Nat. Bank v. ScofieldDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.