Legal Opinion

Vallentine v. Azar

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 489PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by John Vallentine II, one of the plaintiffs below, from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants below, George and Norma Azar. Appellant contends the cause should have been allowed to go to trial.

Vallentine, a college student not quite twenty-one years of age, decided to celebrate New Year’s Eve, 1965, with a few drinks. He knew that the law forbade him to purchase or consume intoxicating beverages in this State but he had previously been successful in doing so in at least five bars in Tucson. In the late afternoon of December 31, 1965, Vallentine…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Davis v. ShiappacosseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. Collier v. StamatisArizona Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McNally v. AddisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Hollerud v. MalamisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Pierce v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Thompson v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API