State v. Charest
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The defendant, Jonathan Charest, appeals the sentence imposed by the Superior Court (Brown, J.) pursuant to RSA 651:2, Il-g (2007) (amended 2011) following his conviction by a jury for being a felon in possession of a firearm. See RSA 159:3,1 (2002). We vacate and remand.
The record establishes the following facts. The defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, contrary to RSA 159:3, which states:
I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he:(a) Owns or has in his possession or under his control, a pistol, revolver, or other firearm, or slungshot, metallic knuckles,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. CrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SouksamraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State of New Hampshire v. John A. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State of New Hampshire v. John A. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014