Legal Opinion

State v. Charest

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 16, 2012No. 2011-307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The defendant, Jonathan Charest, appeals the sentence imposed by the Superior Court (Brown, J.) pursuant to RSA 651:2, Il-g (2007) (amended 2011) following his conviction by a jury for being a felon in possession of a firearm. See RSA 159:3,1 (2002). We vacate and remand.

The record establishes the following facts. The defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, contrary to RSA 159:3, which states:

I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he:(a) Owns or has in his possession or under his control, a pistol, revolver, or other firearm, or slungshot, metallic knuckles,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. LopezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. CrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SouksamraneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  2. State of New Hampshire v. John A. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. State of New Hampshire v. John A. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API