Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

There is involved in one of the cases under consideration the exercise of the right of eminent domain, — the tailing of appellee’s property for the purpose of. constructing’ thereon the improvement in question. The other involves the right to lay a special assessment upon his property, to pay a portion of the-cost 0f the improvement. The vital question in both cases is one of jurisdiction on the part of the boards of supervisors of the two counties in joint session to establish the drainage district.

Pertinent statutes, in which authority must be found for the action of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Richman v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Seibert v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Hartshorn v. Wright County District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Simpson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilbride v. City of AlgonaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Glenn v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Straub v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API