Legal Opinion

People v. O'Rourke

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided June 11, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMax H. Galfunt, J.

The defendants were charged with violating section 353 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, which seeks to prevent overdriving, torturing, and injuring animals.

At the trial the following facts were adduced:

"Mabel,” a horse in harness, is used to pull a hansom cab. On December 30, 1974, defendant Greene, the driver of the cab, was warned by one Inspector Langdon from the A.S.P.C.A. that the horse "Mabel” was limping. Thereupon, the horse was suspended from labor on that day.

Inspector Langdon testified that on the following day, December 31, a check by him revealed that defendant Greene was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KooganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. People v. ArcidiconoSuffolk County District Court · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BuntJustice Court of Town of Rhinebeck · 1983
  2. People v. MahoneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  3. People v. ArroyoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
  4. People v. CurcioCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  5. People v. MerriweatherNassau County District Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API